Notices of Intended Prosecution and S172 Road Traffic Act Notices
When there is an incident involving one or more motorists someone may make a report to the police. If the police decide to enquire they will often serve a S172 Notice under the Road Traffic Act of 1988 upon the registered keeper of the vehicle driven by the suspect. This requires the registered keeper to name the driver on the date and time in question. Such Notices are often accompanied by Notices of Intended Prosecution in which the police state that they are considering prosecuting the driver for one or more motoring offences. Usually, there is a space provided in which the addressee can give an (optional) response.
How should you respond to a S172 Notice?
If you are the registered keeper of the vehicle in question to whom the S172 Notice was addressed you are under a legal duty to respond within 28 days. Failure to respond in the manner sought by the police within the deadline set can amount to a separate offence in itself (punishable with the endorsement of 6 penalty points and a fine). Therefore, most people will respond giving the information sought. This often involves the registered keeper admitting that he/she was the driver on the occasion in question.
How should you respond to a Notice of Intended Prosecution?
Let’s assume you have named yourself as the driver and the NIP states that the police are considering prosecuting the driver for, say, careless driving. You may be sorely tempted to write out your account in full ‘setting the record straight’. After all, the other party was more at fault than you were. But, hang on a minute. Think. The police are not investigating the other party. They have written to you! Even if the other party was more at fault this does not mean that you did not commit the offence into which the police are enquiring. In fact, you might very easily admit the offence in question in the course of ‘setting the record straight’ without realising it and thereby ensure that you are prosecuted! You have a privilege against self-incrimination. Consider carefully whether you wish to use it.
Before you respond, Stop! Ask yourself the following:-
Do you understand the legal ingredients of the offence(s) alleged and the defences relevant to each? Do you have a full understanding and recollection of what actually happened? Are you familiar with the procedure that will unfold and the consequences of committing yourself in writing at this stage? If the answer to all of these questions is ‘yes’, then, go ahead and give your account to the police. If the answer is ‘no’ to some or all of the above you may wish to engage the services of someone who is familiar with dealing with such cases before, rather than after, you respond to the Notice.
Sunil practised from Chambers in London for 25 years. As a junior barrister he would regularly appear on behalf of members of the AA who were being prosecuted for driving offences. Saving driving licences (and consequently careers and livelihoods) became second nature to him. Since then he has appeared in criminal cases from common assault to murder (and everything in between). He has prosecuted and defended in the full range of trial courts from the humble Magistrates’ Courts to the Old Bailey itself. In fact, he was quickly promoted to list ‘A’ counsel on the Attorney General’s list of advocates (reserved for only the best barristers on the list). He has now decided to use his considerable experience for the benefit of the motorist by setting up a boutique, road traffic defence practice, Kent Traffic Law.
Specialising in a range of motoring offences in the UK
If you have you been charged with a motoring offence or you need to save your Driving Licence, Kent Traffic Law can help!
How can Traffic Law help you?